“The FBI is providing certain relevant materials to appropriate congressional committees to assist them in their oversight responsibilities in this matter,” said FBI spokeswoman Carol Cratty. Right now, the public is at a disadvantage and has only part of the story.” The FBI has made public statements in describing its handling of the case, so sharing documents in support of those statements wherever appropriate would make sense. The people’s interest would be served in seeing the documents that are unclassified. “The public’s business ought to be public, with few exceptions.
“The FBI should make as much of the material available as possible,” Grassley said. Grassley (R-IA) did not have many redactions:īut Grassley (R-Iowa) said in a statement “it seems that much of the material given to the Senate today, other than copies of the large number of emails on Secretary Clinton’s server containing classified information, is marked ‘unclassified/for official use.’” Yet documents sent to Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Charles E. “You cannot say one day this is unclassified ‘nothing to see here’ and the next day, only certain people can see this and you must not be able to take it outside of a secure facility.” You could not have it both ways,” former military intelligence officer Tony Shaffer said. “This information being highly classified according to the FBI is in direct conflict with what the State Department and Ms.
The delivery “includes an investigative summary from the FBI’s probe of Clinton reports known as ‘302s’ containing interviews with the Democratic presidential nominee and others and classified emails found on her private server.” The FBI did confirm that Clinton sent and received 113 classified emails and they categorized over 2,000 as “classified after the fact.” From Fox News: But the redactions and secrecy with the documents contradict Clinton’s claims that she did not mishandle classified and secret information.
0 kommentar(er)
